Add skip_deps=AppListSeparatedByCommas feature.
I agree it's a bit of a weird thing, but it's a reasonable and safe extension. When time comes to properly overhaul stuff, skip_deps should disappear entirely.
This allows `rebar ct suites=abc` to consider all suites when
you have a rebar setup with multiple sub_dirs.
Previously, rebar halted after it could not find the suite in the
first dir. But the suite might be present in another dir (when
sub_dirs contains multiple dirs).
This commit makes it so instead of halting, it prints a warning and
continues with looking for the suite in the other `sub_dir`s.
Note -- This uses try/catch to cause the test to be skipped because
otherwise I needed to adjust the return values of 4 functions, the
code path is pretty deeply nested here. Otherwise the whole call chain
needed to be adjusted for this return value:
`run_test -> make_cmd -> get_suites -> find_suite_path`
IMHO, I think for exceptional cases like this it is fine to use throw;
specially since only the {skip} is catched and nothing else.
When a DTL template includes other template files, those files don't need
to be compiled separately, and therefore can be given an extension different
from `source_ext` (such as `.dtli`) to avoid being compiled. This fix
allows rebar to find included dependencies with names `*.dtl*` rather
than `*.dtl` and properly determine if a template file needs to be recompiled.
Handle the case where the error didn't occur in the file being
compiled. That is, if there is an error on line 9 of bar.hrl,
instead of:
/path/to/foo.erl:9: type foo() already defined
print:
/path/to/bar.hrl:9: type foo() already defined
The printed message is made more terse.
Example before applying patch:
ERROR: Compiling template src/view/test.dtl failed:
{error,{"src/view/test.dtl",
[{{4,7},
erlydtl_parser,
["syntax error before: ",["\"\\\"HELLO_WORLD\\\"\""]]}]}}
Example after applying patch:
ERROR: Compiling template "src/cmp_html_error_template.dtl" failed:
(line:3, col:12): ["syntax error before: ",["trans"]]
Added a backward compartible feature to specify `erlydtl_opts' options
for the DTL template compiler to allow inclusion of templates in different
directories with different compilation settings for each. E.g.:
{erlydtl_opts, [
[{doc_root, "src/view"}, {module_ext, "_dtl_vw"}]
, [{doc_root, "src"}, {module_ext, ""}, {recursive, false}]
, {out_dir, "ebin"}
, {compiler_options, [verbose, debug_info]}
]}.
The definition above is identical to this (the last two options
are duplicated in each list):
{erlydtl_opts, [
[{doc_root, "src/view"}
,{module_ext, "_dtl_vw"}
,{out_dir, "ebin"}
,{compiler_options, [verbose, debug_info]}]
, [{doc_root, "src"}
,{module_ext, ""}
,{out_dir, "ebin"}
,{compiler_options, [verbose, debug_info]}
,{recursive, false}]
]}.
In this case "src/view" and "src" directories containing template files
will be compiled. A new `recursive' option tells rebar_erlydtl_compiler
to search files recursively from a given doc_root. In the example above
the "src" directory won't be scanned recursively, and the target template
name for target beam modules won't have "_dtl_vw" suffix.
Introduce a new 'raw' option for dependency specs in rebar.config file.
For example:
{deps,
{dependency_name, "1.0.*",
{git, "<...>", {branch, "master"}},
[raw]
}
]}.
When this option is specified, rebar does not require the dependency to
have a standard Erlang/OTP layout which assumes presence of either
"src/dependency_name.app.src" or "ebin/dependency_name.app" files.
'raw' dependencies can still contain 'rebar.config' and even can have
the proper OTP directory layout, but they won't be compiled.
Only a subset of rebar commands will be executed on the 'raw'
subdirectories:
get-deps, update-deps, check-deps, list-deps and delete-deps.
This allows an <app-name>.app.src.script to be defined and evaluated
when <app-name>.app.src or <app-name>.app are loaded. This allows the
user to add project specific manipulations to app metadata.
