Since rebar_deps:get_deps_dir/1 returns an absolute path,
lists:member(Deps, Parts2) will always return false, thus .test.spec
files in deps/ will not be ignored.
Loading .app, .app.src or .app.src.script returns now the value as per
the documentation (was wrapped in a list in some cases).
More places in the code detect .app.src.script and handle it.
rebar_app_utils:is_app_dir/1 failed to search for .app.src.script when
looking for an app file in src/.
While at it, fix inconsistent module export list.
On my slow old netbook with a 1.6GHz CPU, this inttest
takes about 40 seconds to run, of which network activity
is about 3s, the default timeout of retest is 30s.
Add a generous margin to avoid unnecessary timeouts.
exercises rebar/gpb integration
The bulk of these tests are written by Luis Rascão, hence he is the
author of this commit. As the committer, I have cherry-picked his two
commits 4c87bcd and ebb8182, from the feature/support_gpb_protobuf
branch in the git://github.com/lrascao/rebar repo, and have slightly
adapted it to fit this pluggable-proto-compilers-gpb branch.
Update the THANKS file
This adds the config option {proto_compiler,gpb} for selecting gpb
as the compiler for protocol buffer files. When gpb is used as
compiler, it reads the gpb_opts config item for options.
Make it possible for plug in alternative protocol buffer compilers.
The compilers are picked up based on if they export all of the
functions key/0, proto_compile/3, proto_clean/3 and proto_info/2.
The set of compiler modules to choose from, is fetched from the rebar
application environment, from the app_dir modules.
A new config option, {proto_compiler,Compiler}, specifies which of
the available protocol buffer compilers to use. The 'protobuffs'
compiler is now one such compiler (the only one), and it is also the
default, for backwards compatibility.
When the option {cover_print_enabled, true} is set and that the code
coverage is 100%, the '%' will end up being truncated.
This patch makes it so that the truncation happens at 4 a characters
width so that instead of the following printouts:
some_mod : 99%
some_other: 100
We instead show:
some_mod : 99%
some_other: 100%
This solves issue #331 as reported by @lispking and @NineFX.
